Understand data sources and verification
Review public company and contact information separately from inferred qualification context.
When to use this
Use this when deciding whether a field is suitable for outreach, export, delivery, or correction.
Requirements and availability
- Public information can be incomplete, changed, or wrong.
- Company details, contact details, public links, qualification output, and a suggested angle are different evidence types.
- Human review remains necessary.
How to do it
- Review company facts separately from named contact fields.
- Visit the company website and available public profiles.
- Confirm employment, role, company identity, and contact method.
- Treat Why they match and Suggested first angle as generated context.
- Stop using wrong information and submit a correction.
Fields and controls
| Control | What it does |
|---|---|
| Company website | Public source for current company identity. |
| Public profile link | Source for reviewing the represented profile. |
| Qualification score / Why they match | Leama output based on profile and available evidence. |
| Suggested first angle | Generated context requiring review. |
What happens next
A reviewer can explain what was observed, generated, missing, and still needs current verification.
States you may see
| State | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Present | A value exists; presence does not guarantee currentness. |
| Missing | No value exists and none should be inferred. |
| Correction requested | Stop using the disputed value while reviewed. |
Credits and usage
Review and correction requests do not use credits.
Common problems
| Problem | What to check |
|---|---|
| A value cannot be verified | Do not use it as confirmed until a reliable current source supports it. |